This is how false teaching arrives:
A man with a white lab coat and rubber mallet in his pocket protector arrives in order to “heal you.” And just think, you didn’t even know you were sick! Still, after hmms and haws, he pull a bottle of medicine from a pocket, holds your nose and chucks a spoonful down your throat.
At this point, you gag and retch and run to the sink, where you empty your stomach.
“Ah,” says he, “the case is worse than I had thought! A double dose is what you need!”
You swallow, and retch twice as violently as before and drop to your knees.
“It’s obvious that you stand in need of my remedy worse than most. A triple dose is called for!” You choke it down, falling prone on the floor, your face drained of color, wheezing and tear-streaked.
A peddler of strange elixirs, potions which cannot be bought in just any store; he’s a trickster, and he usually charges plenty for his wares – probably money, definitely a chunk of your soul.
Why must we defend true doctrine and reject the false? I hope it’s not just that we can satisfy our own fussiness. I’ve seen those who love to make things “even”, but for their own mental and psychological satisfaction, as Carl Sandburg wrote in a favorite poem of mine:
The abracadabra boys – have they been in the stacks and cloisters? Have they been to a sea of jargons and brought back jargons? They foregather and make pitty pat with each other in Latin and in their private pig Latin, very ofay. Do they have fun? Sure – their fun is being what they are… (http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/238494)
True doctrine is not ensuring that our system has all its “t”s crossed and “i”s dotted, nor ducks arranged in order of color and height. Truth speakers need not be pickers of nits or splitters of hairs. Rather, it is making sure that we follow God’s truth and avoid the “teachings of demons” (1 Tim 4:1): the Evil One oversees a factory with round-the-clock shifts, a production line of ideas to draw people away from God. The collection he’s brought out this year is nothing new; they’re old lies, spray painted with this season’s colors. (more…)




Buy Strack and Billerbeck’s Commentary – but beware! [technical article]
Its drawbacks:
First, S-B treated Judaism as if it were one monolithic whole, and did not take into account the differences between one group and another or the changes that took place in Judaism throughout the centuries. So if they located a found a parallel to (more…)
- Aramaic
- Bible
- Bible Dictionaries
- Bible study
- Biblical languages
- Church
- Church history
- Commentaries
- Culture
- Dead Sea scrolls Qumran
- Discernment
- Greek of the New Testament
- Hebrew
- hermeneutic
- History
- Inductive Bible study
- Islam
- Jewish culture
- Judaism
- kingdom of God
- Kittel
- language
- Matthew
- Midrash
- Mishnah Mishna
- New Testament Interpretation
- Old Testament Interpretation
- Rabbi rabbinic
- Strack Billerbeck
- Talmud
on March 26, 2013 at 11:54 am Leave a CommentTags: Bible, Billerbeck, Kittel, Kommentar, Midrash, Strack, Talmud